ExCO Meeting July 1, 1998
The meeting was held at the Pell Library at the University of Rhode
Island. Attending were: P. Wiebe, L. Madin, R. Beardsley, D.
Mountain, K. Wishner, T. Durbin, J. Bisagni. D. Busch also attended.
Peter reviewed the agenda:
- Plan a meeting of Phase III investigators, as
requested by the Program Managers;
- Continue planning for the Data Workshop in
September.
No other items were tabled for the agenda.
1. Phase III Meeting:
A list of potential Phase III PI's and proposal titles, supplied by
the program managers, was distributed. Phil Taylor indicated that the
list is not a definitive list, nor are the budgets that have been
discussed with the PI's. The list was reviewed and broken out by
theme: northeast peak dynamics/crossover, southern flank tidal mixing
front, modeling, broad scale. (In some cases, the titles given below
have been abbreviated.)
Process -
- NE Peak:
- Beardsley and Limeburner - Frontal exchange over
eastern GB
- Townsend et al. - Origins of cod on Georges Bank:
contributions from the Scotian shelf
- (also some proposals listed under Southern Flank
which will address both regions)
- Southern Flank:
- Bucklin and McGillicuddy - Maintenance of
Psuedoclananus populations
- Gifford, Belkin, Sieraki - Cross-frontal
processes and Calanus diet
- Hebert and Barth - Cross-frontal fluxes
and mixing
- Wishner - Cross-frontal exchange
of zooplankton
- (the Gifford/Hebert/Wishner proposals are
integrated - and may be both NE Peak and
southern flank)
- Houghton - Cross frontal exchange dye study
(both NE Peak & s. flank)
- Ledwell, Churchill - Cross frontal exchange
(by dye and drifters)
- Lough, et al. - Tidal front entrainment of larval
fish
- Madin et al. - Predation: role of tidal processes
and small Predator species
(includes broad-scale, lab and mesocosm
work; field work at both southern flank
and NE peak)
- Ohman, Durbin, Runge - Frontal processes and
copepod population dynamics (includes
broad scale survey sampling and NE peak)
- Schlitz, Chen, Lough - Phy/bio processes at the
tidally mixed front
- General:
- Bisagni - Satellite estimates of mixing
Modelling -
- Franks and Chen - Modeling plankton and fish in the
tidal-mixing front
- Lynch et al. - Real-time data assimilation
- Werner and Runge - Productivity of Calanus and
fluctuations in larval growth and survival
Broad Scale -
- Brink, Irish, Beardsley, Limeburner - Long term
moorings/drifters
- Durbin - Zooplankton distribution and abundance
- Fairbanks and Houghton - Modes of circulation/mixing
from oxygen isotopes
- Miller - Growth and development of Calanus
- Mountain et al. - Broad scale ichthyoplankton,
hydrography and nutrient studies
- Wiebe - Broad-scale acoustic patterns of zooplankton
and nekton
Programmatic -
- Wiebe and Groman - Program services and data
management
One of the questions that needs to be answered at the PI meeting is
"What components are not being funded that other PI's are depending
on?" Another question is "What science that will be important to the
program as a whole is not being funded?" In discussion, one potential
missing component was identified as VPR-type sampling to rapidly
measure zooplankton for estimating cross frontal exchange. This
sampling might augment one of the currently identified frontal
studies. A second was zooplankton conditions in the Gulf of Maine
that are important to the development of the Georges Bank populations.
Indications from the program managers are that the tentative budgets
currently on the table are about $1.1 million over what the program
has available. They want to have PI input before making final
decisions. One approach mentioned to dealing with a short fall in the
first year would be postponing the field work a year. EXCO didn't feel
that the
postponing was a viable approach. A second approach would be to
eliminate a component of the program - e.g., the north east peak work.
A third would be for the budget of each funded proposal to be further
reduced.
The PI Meeting may want to focus discussion on the different regional
experiments - e.g., the southern flank studies and the NE peak
studies. More information about the specifics of the shortfall (how
much, which years) may be needed from the program managers before the
PI meeting could explore all of the options to solve the short fall.
In addition to the budgeting issue, the meeting will be the first time
that the
different PI's will be able to hear and see what the other PI's in the
program are planning. This will be important to final planning of the
ship scheduling.
2. Data Workshop:
It was decided to postpone further planning of the data workshop until
the next meeting.
3. Additional Topic:
Ted Durbin raised the issue of continuing using the MOC-10 on broad
scale survey cruises. His feeling is that the catches are so low that
the samples don't warrant the time and effort required to collect
them. Comparisons are being made between the catches of the MOC-1 vs
the MOC-10 could indicate if the MOC-1 is as efficient as the MOC-10
for different species. The issue will be revisited when these
comparisons are available - perhaps at the data workshop.
The meeting adjourned at 1 PM.
Last modified: July 6, 1996