|
|
|
GLOBEC NWA SI Meeting |
|
June 22, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
It’s hard! |
|
What to focus on |
|
What to leave out |
|
There’s never enough money |
|
No single way to do it |
|
Multiple paths |
|
Multiple groups of people |
|
No prescribed end product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make general conclusions from specific
information |
|
Requires speculation and extrapolation |
|
Takes lots of time and interactive discussion |
|
Can’t be done by large group, usually takes
smaller group of 4 – 8 individuals, or several smaller groups which come
together along the way |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data goes through processing & statistics to
create |
|
Information gets synthesized to create |
|
Knowledge gets integrated into the political
process to inform and enable |
|
Action which (hopefully) will result in |
|
Societal Benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
Program Assessment Rating Tool |
|
“The PART was developed to assess and improve
program performance so that the Federal government can achieve better
results. A PART review helps identify a program’s strengths and weaknesses
to inform funding and management decisions aimed at making the program more
effective.” |
|
The NOAA Ecosystem Matrix program will be
“PART-ed” this year |
|
COP sits within Ecosystem Matrix, as does much
of NMFS |
|
NMFS was “PART-ed” last year, with a rating of
“adequate” |
|
|
|
|
|
Modeling advances |
|
Data |
|
Students |
|
Influence on future programs |
|
What will be the legacy of GLOBEC NWA? |
|
|
|
|
Data management (Wiebe plus many others) |
|
National conferences (Haidvogel, Batchelder,
Werner) |
|
Pan-regional synthesis (Fogarty + regional
Chairs) |
|
Book(s) (Ohman, Beardsley) |
|
Quantitative skill assessment (McGillicuddy,
Brodeur) |
|
Ecosystem approaches to management (Murawski,
Fogarty) |
|
|
|
|
|
“GLOBEC is designed to evaluate the likely
consequences of changes in global climate and physics to the sustainability
of animal production in the sea” (GLOBEC Report #1, page 11) |
|
“GLOBEC intends to vastly increase our
understanding of the fundamental mechanistic processes that dictate |
|
The abundance of marine animals |
|
The fluctuations in their abundance, and |
|
The secondary production of ocean ecosystems in
the context of a changing global climate” (GLOBEC Report #1, page 20) |
|
|
|
|
“The challenge to all prospective investigators
is to demonstrate convincingly that their work leads to a new level of
understanding of the links between the atmosphere, ocean physics, and
population dynamics of marine organisms, in the context of climate change” (GLOBEC
Report #6, p 6) |
|
|
|
|
In situ growth rather than lateral exchange is
the dominant process controlling the abundance of animals on the Bank; |
|
Seasonal density stratification over the S flank
causes prey aggregation in the pycnocline and thus increased survival of
predator populations; |
|
Temporal changes in mixing and stratification
may control the abundance and spp. composition of phytoplankton which in
turn may result in different rates of growth and production of herbivorous
copepods in well-mixed, frontal, and stratified regions of the Bank; |
|
The occurrence of large, episodic exchanges of
water and organisms on/off the Bank contributes to variability in popn
abundances; |
|
Seasonal density stratification and the
processes of turbulent mixing influence predator-prey encounter rates and
thus the growth and survival of individual organisms; |
|
Predation rather than starvation is the dominant
source of mortality of fish larvae; predation rather than advective loss is
the dominant source of mortality of copepods. |
|
|
|
|
|
“The study is envisioned to begin in 1993, with
major field experiments to be conducted in 1994, 1996, and 1998…In the
intervening years, 1995 and 1997, less intensive broad-scale survey work
should be conducted to monitor inter-annual variability” No mention of synthesis phase or further
phases beyond field years. |
|
Funding began in 1993, field experiments in
1995, 1997, 1999. Decade of funding
since program began. |
|
Total = $54 M over 11 years |
|
$10.5M for shiptime |
|
$4M per year 1993-1995 = $12M |
|
$3M in 1996 = $3M |
|
$4.5M per year 1997-2001 = $22.5M |
|
$2M per year 2002-2004 = $6M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What do you know now about Georges Bank that you
didn’t know 10 years ago? |
|
If you were to re-write the NWA Implementation
Plan (GLOBEC Report #6) pp 6-24, what would be different? |
|
Georges Bank book? |
|
“State of Georges Bank” report? |
|
How will changing climate/NAO affect GB
processes, structure, and function? |
|
The secondary production of ocean ecosystems in
the context of a changing global climate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98/99 recruitment |
|
98 copepods? |
|
Scotian Shelf crossovers |
|
Hydrographic interannual variability |
|
NAO shifts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
“In some ways we are more confused than ever,
but we feel that we are confused on a higher level and about more important
things” |
|
What questions would you now ask about Georges
Bank/GoMe, that you couldn’t ask before GLOBEC? |
|
|
|
|
|
What are the dominant/controlling processes on
Georges Bank? |
|
What larger (basin-scale) processes are at work
to determine popn dyn and secondary production on GB? |
|
How would a climate signal propagate through the
GB ecosystem? |
|
“links between the atmosphere, ocean physics,
and population dynamics of marine organisms, in the context of climate
change” |
|
|
|
|
|
Predictive capability |
|
What can you predict? On what time/space scales?
With what uncertainty? Who
will use these predictions? How
will these predictions be used? |
|
Management uses |
|
What GLOBEC results are being used now in
fisheries management? How has
GLOBEC improved the management of living marine resources? |
|
Where, when and how often should future
measurements be taken to capture important features of Georges Bank/GoMe?
(tie-in with Ocean Observations) |
|
Technology development |
|
What GLOBEC technology is routinely used in NOAA
operations now? |
|
|
|
|
In early GLOBEC years, Zack and Peter pounded
the corridors of Congress drumming up support for the program |
|
In past COP crises, it was argued that some
action/budget cut/reorganization would be devastating to GLOBEC |
|
Now, it’s time to show how support in Congress
and saving COP funding has led to tremendous success in GLOBEC |
|
|