"Growth and feeding of larval..."
Growth and feeding of larval cod | |
(Gadus morhua) in the Barents Sea and the Georges Bank | |
Trond Kristiansen, Frode Vikebø, Svein Sundby, Geir Huse, Øyvind Fiksen, Greg Lough, Larry Buckley, and Cisco Werner |
Three types of models: | |
A mechanistic individual-based model for simulating | |
bioenergetics, behaviour, and feeding of larval cod | |
A general circulation model to simulate the dynamics | |
of the ocean (the ROMS model) | |
A 3D zooplankton model to simulate the dynamical | |
prey field |
Study how environmental conditions such as: | ||
Light | ||
Temperature | ||
Turbulence | ||
Food abundance | ||
affect growth rate of larval fish |
Specific growth rate (SGR): the amount of weight increase over 24 hours relative to total weight | ||
Maximum growth: The physiologically possible growth restricted by temperature alone |
"Varying light and prey availability..."
Varying light and prey availability at two locations for two different levels of temperature, and zero turbulence. |
"Varying light and prey availability..."
Varying light and prey availability at the two locations, and increasing temperature by 2 degrees C. |
"How do light and temperature..."
How do light and temperature for two levels of food abundance and turbulence regulate growth of 5mm on April 1 and May 1? | |
"Varying light and temperature"
Varying light and temperature, with estimated prey distribution from the zooplankton model for larva kept fixed in space. |
Preliminary conclusions | |
Light is limiting feeding and growth prior to mid-April. | |
By early May, the number of light hours increases (17/24) and growth is mainly determined by water temperature. | |
High prey densities is not a requirement for growth, but may reduce the activity level of the larvae and reduce their visibility to predators. |
Two important cod stocks in different habitats
Spawning migration: | ||
Georges Bank: Short spawning migration | ||
Barents Sea: Very long spawning migration | ||
Central recruitment hypothesis: | ||
Barents Sea: Match-mismatch | ||
Georges Bank: Larval loss | ||
Temperature-recruitment relations: | ||
Georges Bank: No clear temperature-recruitment relation | ||
Barents Sea: Srong temperature-recruitment relationships | ||
Dominant prey for larvae and early juveniles | ||
- Georges Bank: Pseudo/Paracalanus spp. | ||
Barents Sea: Calanus finmarchicus | ||
Light, climate, spawning and larval growth: | ||
Georges Bank: Extended spawning period in winter/spring | ||
Barents Sea: Compressed spawning around equinox and rapid larval and juvenile growth thereafter |
Objectives: Use the same model setup for the Barents Sea and the Georges Bank ecosystems and model drift, dispersal, growth, feeding, survival, and behavior. | |
Identify the major processes that affect survival variability between ecosystems. | |
Simulate a set of years that contributed strongly to recruitment in each of the ecosystems, and try to understand the major underlying causes. | |
Meet objectives using: | |
- Physical model (ROMS) | |
- Individual based model (IBM) | |
- What about prey fields? Modeled prey fields? Theoretical prey fields? Observed prey fields? | |
- How many prey stages should be included? | |
- What type of atmospheric data to use? | |
- +++ |