"Growth and feeding of larval..."
| Growth and feeding of larval cod | |
| (Gadus morhua) in the Barents Sea and the Georges Bank | |
| Trond Kristiansen, Frode Vikebø, Svein Sundby, Geir Huse, Øyvind Fiksen, Greg Lough, Larry Buckley, and Cisco Werner |
| Three types of models: | |
| A mechanistic individual-based model for simulating | |
| bioenergetics, behaviour, and feeding of larval cod | |
| A general circulation model to simulate the dynamics | |
| of the ocean (the ROMS model) | |
| A 3D zooplankton model to simulate the dynamical | |
| prey field |
| Study how environmental conditions such as: | ||
| Light | ||
| Temperature | ||
| Turbulence | ||
| Food abundance | ||
| affect growth rate of larval fish | ||
| Specific growth rate (SGR): the amount of weight increase over 24 hours relative to total weight | ||
| Maximum growth: The physiologically possible growth restricted by temperature alone | ||
"Varying light and prey availability..."
| Varying light and prey availability at two locations for two different levels of temperature, and zero turbulence. |
"Varying light and prey availability..."
| Varying light and prey availability at the two locations, and increasing temperature by 2 degrees C. |
"How do light and temperature..."
| How do light and temperature for two levels of food abundance and turbulence regulate growth of 5mm on April 1 and May 1? | |
"Varying light and temperature"
| Varying light and temperature, with estimated prey distribution from the zooplankton model for larva kept fixed in space. |
| Preliminary conclusions | |
| Light is limiting feeding and growth prior to mid-April. | |
| By early May, the number of light hours increases (17/24) and growth is mainly determined by water temperature. | |
| High prey densities is not a requirement for growth, but may reduce the activity level of the larvae and reduce their visibility to predators. |
Two important cod stocks in different habitats
| Spawning migration: | ||
| Georges Bank: Short spawning migration | ||
| Barents Sea: Very long spawning migration | ||
| Central recruitment hypothesis: | ||
| Barents Sea: Match-mismatch | ||
| Georges Bank: Larval loss | ||
| Temperature-recruitment relations: | ||
| Georges Bank: No clear temperature-recruitment relation | ||
| Barents Sea: Srong temperature-recruitment relationships | ||
| Dominant prey for larvae and early juveniles | ||
| - Georges Bank: Pseudo/Paracalanus spp. | ||
| Barents Sea: Calanus finmarchicus | ||
| Light, climate, spawning and larval growth: | ||
| Georges Bank: Extended spawning period in winter/spring | ||
| Barents Sea: Compressed spawning around equinox and rapid larval and juvenile growth thereafter | ||
| Objectives: Use the same model setup for the Barents Sea and the Georges Bank ecosystems and model drift, dispersal, growth, feeding, survival, and behavior. | |
| Identify the major processes that affect survival variability between ecosystems. | |
| Simulate a set of years that contributed strongly to recruitment in each of the ecosystems, and try to understand the major underlying causes. | |
| Meet objectives using: | |
| - Physical model (ROMS) | |
| - Individual based model (IBM) | |
| - What about prey fields? Modeled prey fields? Theoretical prey fields? Observed prey fields? | |
| - How many prey stages should be included? | |
| - What type of atmospheric data to use? | |
| - +++ |