0530 ---- Figure 1: Initial and final positions of a cloud of fluid-following particles released at a depth of 17m in (a) simulation EN324NF_clim.01, and (b) simulation EN324NF_clim.02. Simulation time is six days. en324nf_clim_pos.ps Figure 2: Simulated trajectory of a fluid-following particle released at the proposed tracer release site on the North Flank. drifter_tr3.ps Figure 3: Residual velocity error in the third Quoddy simulation of experiment (a) EN324NF_FC.01 and (b) EN324NF_FC.02. EN324NF_FC.01_vel.ps EN324NF_FC.02_vel.ps Figure 4: Simulated particle trajectories before (dashed line) and after (solid line) assimilation in experiment (a) EN324NF_FC.01 and (b) EN324NF_FC.02. en324NF_FC.01-02_pos.ps Figure 5: Residual velocity error in the third Quoddy simulation of experiment (a) EN324NF_FC.03 and (b) EN324NF_FC.04. EN324NF_FC.03_vel.ps EN324NF_FC.04_vel.ps Figure 6: Simulated particle trajectories before (dashed line) and after (solid line) assimilation in experiment (a) EN324NF_FC.03 and (b) EN324NF_FC.04. en324NF_FC.03-04_pos.ps 0531-0601 --------- Figure 1: Simulated and observed velocities in the three Quoddy runs of forecast run EN324NF_06. en324nf_fc.06f_adcp Figure 2: A sample alongtrack ADCP velocity record from the North flank. Note that bottom tracking is lost at approximately the 180m isobath. Tick marks on top of each plot indicate data points which are ignored due to this dropout. nf_adcp.ps Figure 3: Simulated and observed drifter trajectories in forecast runs (a) EN324NF_02 (re-run as EN324NF_10). (b) EN324NF_06 (c) EN324NF_07 (d) EN324NF_12 (e) EN324NF_13 en324nf_fc10_dr1.ps en324nf_fc06f_dr1.ps en324nf_fc07f_dr1.ps en324nf_fc.12f_dr1.ps en324nf_fc.13f_dr1.ps 0602 ---- Figure 1: Simulated and observed drifter trajectories in forecast runs (a) EN324NF_14 (b) EN324NF_15 (c) EN324NF_16 (d) EN324NF_17 en324nf_fc.14_dr1.ps en324nf_fc.15_dr1.ps en324nf_fc.16_dr1.ps en324nf_fc.17_dr1.ps 0603 ---- Figure 1: Simulated and observed drifter trajectories in forecast run EN324NF_16: (a) drifter deployment 1; (b) deployment 2 deep drifters; and (c) deployment 2 shallow drifters. Figure 2: Simulated and observed drifter trajectories in forecast run EN324NF_18: (a) drifter deployment 1; (b) deployment 2 deep drifters; and (c) deployment 2 shallow drifters. Figure 3: Simulated and observed drifter trajectories in forecast run EN324NF_19: (a) drifter deployment 1; (b) deployment 2 deep drifters; and (c) deployment 2 shallow drifters. Figure 4: Forecast skill evaluation based on the movement of the North Flank dye patch: (a) tracer release location (star) and track lines for the first dye survey; (b) simulated trajectory of the dye and a synoptic map of the observations advected to the final time using modeled velocities (see text). release3_0603_frame1.ps release3_0603_frame2.ps Figure 5: Simulated trajectory of a fluid-following particle released at the tracer release site on the North Flank. drifter_tr3_07.ps 0604 ---- Figure 1: Forecast skill evaluation based on the movement of the North Flank dye patch: (a) tracer release location (star) and track lines for the second dye survey; (b) simulated trajectory of the dye and a synoptic map of the observations advected to the final time using modeled velocities (see text). release3_06041_frame1.ps release3_06041_frame2.ps Figure 2: Simulated trajectory of the dye and a synoptic map of the observations in the first dye survey advected to the final time using modeled velocities. release3_0603h1_frame2.ps Figure 3: Time series of elevation boundary conditions derived from the UNC far-field model used to drive forecast run EN324NF_FC.23. jun04_gbk1.cbc.ps Figure 4: Simulated and observed drifter trajectories in forecast run EN324NF_19: (a) deployment 2 deep drifters; (c) deployment 2 shallow drifters. en324nf_fc.19_dr2d.ps en324nf_fc.19_dr3d.ps Figure 5: Simulated and observed drifter trajectories in forecast run EN324NF_22: (a) deployment 2 deep drifters; (c) deployment 2 shallow drifters. en324nf_fc.22_dr2.ps en324nf_fc.22_dr3.ps Figure 6: Simulated and observed drifter trajectories in forecast run EN324NF_23: (a) deployment 2 deep drifters; (c) deployment 2 shallow drifters. en324nf_fc.23_dr2.ps en324nf_fc.23_dr3.ps Figure 7: Simulated trajectory of a fluid-following particle released at the tracer release site on the North Flank. drifter_tr3_21d.ps 0605 ---- Figure 1: Simulated and observed drifter trajectories (deep drifters only) in forecast runs (a) EN324NF_19 (b) EN324NF_22 (c) EN324NF_23 (d) EN324NF_24 (e) EN324NF_25 (f) EN324NF_26 (g) EN324NF_28. en324nf_fc.19_dr1n.ps en324nf_fc.22_dr1n.ps en324nf_fc.23_dr1n.ps en324nf_fc.24_dr1n.ps en324nf_fc.25_dr1n.ps en324nf_fc.26_dr1n.ps en324nf_fc.28_dr1n.ps Figure 2: Forecast skill evaluation based on the movement of the North Flank dye patch: (a) tracer release location (star) and track lines for the third dye survey; (b) simulated trajectory of the dye and a synoptic map of the observations advected to the final time using modeled velocities (see text). release3_0605_frame1.ps release3_0605_frame2.ps