THE U. S. GLOBAL OCEAN ECOSYSTEMS DYNAMICS PROGRAM
and
THE COASTAL OCEAN PROCESSES PROGRAM
The Northeast Pacific Study: Co-ordinated Coastal Research
Phase I: Modeling, Retrospective Analysis and Pilot Observing Projects
Announcement of Opportunity
Deadline: 14 February 1997
| NSF Logo | NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Directorate for Geosciences, Division of Ocean Sciences |
| NOAA Logo | NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
Coastal Ocean Program & National Marine Fisheries Service |
INTRODUCTION
Research activities in the coastal Northeast Pacific Ocean are supported
by a number of organizations including the National Science Foundation's
(NSF) Division of Ocean Sciences (OCE) and the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) Coastal Ocean Program (COP) and National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS).
NSF/OCE generally supports research projects focused on basic
oceanographic and ecological processes and the study of natural systems.
A component of NOAA's COP focus is directed towards developing tools and
capabilities to improve ecosystem management. Environmental and
resources management decisions are most appropriately based on knowledge
gained from both basic and applied research.
This Announcement of Opportunity is under the auspices of the Global
Ocean Ecosystems Dynamics (U. S. GLOBEC) and Coastal Ocean Processes
(CoOP) programs within NSF/OCE, and the regional ecosystem studies and
U. S. GLOBEC initiatives of NOAA's COP. An opportunity exists for U.S.
scientists to propose modeling, retrospective analysis, and pilot
monitoring projects that address the broad intersection of basic and
applied research interests of NSF/OCE and NOAA/COP in the above programs
and as described below. The U.S. GLOBEC and CoOP plans envision the
larger Northeast Pacific/West Coast of North America program proceeding
in stages. The present Announcement of Opportunity addresses three
initial activities: modeling, retrospective studies, and a modest pilot
observational program. Subsequent announcements, contingent upon the
availability of funds, will be directed toward detailed process studies
and extended monitoring efforts and will be formulated using the results
of the initial studies carried out under the present Announcement.
The anticipated funding for the initial activities in the Northeast
Pacific Study: Co-ordinated Coastal Research Program is approximately
$2.5M per year, for up to three years. The agencies anticipate making
up to 20 awards The deadline for proposals is 14 February 1997.
Preliminary decisions on which projects will be recommended for awards
will be made by 1 July 1997. Awards will start either 1 August or 15
October 1997.
DESCRIPTION
Coastal Ocean Processes (CoOP) is an inter-disciplinary program with
goals to obtain a quantitative understanding of the processes that
control the transport, transformation and fate of biological, geological
and chemical material on the continental margins. CoOP's goal in
studying the California Current System of the Northeast Pacific is to
understand the processes which contribute to cross-shelf transport
processes where the circulation is strongly wind-driven. While all
continental shelves experience some wind-driven transport, the
along-shore wind is the dominant forcing agent along much of the U. S.
west coast.
Global Ocean Ecosystems Dynamics (U. S. GLOBEC) is a component of the
U.S. Global Change Research Program, with the goals of understanding and
ultimately predicting how populations of marine animal species
(holozooplankton, fish and benthic invertebrates) respond to natural and
anthropogenic changes in global climate. There is a close connection
between the ecosystem dynamics in both gyres in the northeast Pacific
Ocean - the California Current System (CCS) and the Coastal Gulf of
Alaska (CGOA). Changes in these two systems are linked to climatic
changes in basin-scale oceanic and atmospheric circulation patterns.
This linkage makes the northeast Pacific Ocean an important region in
which to pursue U.S. GLOBEC goals. The rich historical data sets
available in the northeast Pacific help make it possible to accomplish
these goals with respect to processes which occur over longer time
scales.
The research community has produced, through CoOP and U. S. GLOBEC,
science plans which describe program goals and approaches. These are
available from the respective program offices (see below). The planning
assumption unifying both programs is that a series of inter-disciplinary
process and modeling studies will provide significant new information to
advance our understanding of oceanic processes along the northeast
margins of the Pacific Ocean. This increased understanding will have
applicability to environmental impact and resource management issues.
A CoOP community workshop report entitled "Coastal Ocean Processes:
Wind-Driven Transport Process on the U.S. West CoastÓ defines areas for
study that would lead to better quantitative understanding of the
processes that dominate the transport, transformations, and fates of
biologically, chemically, and geologically important matter in a
strongly wind-driven system. Copies of the workshop report (CoOP Report
No. 4, see References for all report titles) are available from the
following address or the CoOP homepage:
The CoOP Office
Horn Point Laboratory
University of Maryland
P.O. Box 775
Cambridge, MD 21613-0775
Phone: 410-221-8416; Fax: 410-221-8490
Internet: hawkey@hpel.umd.edu
http://www.coop.hpel.cees.edu.
The U.S. GLOBEC Northeast Pacific Implementation Plan (U. S. GLOBEC
Report No. 17) is based on U.S. GLOBEC documents resulting from several
community-wide meetings where U.S. scientists from the oceanographic and
fisheries communities specified key scientific issues and research
prospectuses for the eastern Pacific. For the California Current System,
these are U.S.GLOBEC Report No. 7
and U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 11. For
the coastal Gulf of Alaska, the relevant reports are U.S. GLOBEC Report
No. 15 and U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 16. Copies of these documents are
available from the following address or homepage:
The U.S. GLOBEC Coordinating Office
Department of Integrative Biology
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-3140
Phone: 510-643-0877; Fax: 510-643-1142
Internet: kaygold@uclink4.berkeley.edu
http://www.usglobec.berkeley.edu/usglobec/globec.homepage.html.
THE COASTAL NORTHEAST PACIFIC.
The effect of strong along-shore wind in driving the coastal currents and
the resulting cross-shelf transport in the surface and bottom boundary
layers is of first order importance in determining the cross-margin
transport along the U.S. West Coast. Along-shore winds blowing towards
the equator force near-surface waters offshore. In turn, deeper waters
are drawn onshore and upward, bringing cold, nutrient rich waters to the
surface. High nutrient levels result in enhanced primary production
which in turn fuels the entire ecosystem. Current fluctuations are
driven by the wind, either locally, or at a distance through a mechanism
of waves being trap by the coast. Strong onshore-offshore transport can
result in short residence times over the shelf (days). Despite such
short residence times, wind-driven systems such as occur in the
Northeast Pacific show pronounced, persistent biological zonations that
are not understood in terms of how they continue to exist within the
dynamic physical setting.
Strongly correlated signals exist in physical and biological variables
along the eastern boundaries of the subarctic and subtropical gyres in
the northeast Pacific Ocean -- the currents of the CGOA and the CCS.
These signals vary over a wide range of time scales (from seasonal to
interdecadal). Tide gauge and altimeter data suggest that the strengths
of the boundary currents in these gyres covary out of phase on annual
and interannual time scales (the equatorward CCS strengthens, while the
poleward and westward current in the CGOA weakens, and vice versa). On
interdecadal time scales, there are data suggesting that zooplankton and
salmon covary out of phase in the two boundary currents. The
interdecadal fluctuations of these populations, and others, coincide
with basin-scale physical changes in atmospheric forcing and surface
ocean conditions (temperature, mixed-layer depth), although the
mechanisms responsible for the coupled variability are not known.
THE CO-ORDINATED RESEARCH PROGRAM
The recommendations contained in the U.S. GLOBEC Northeast Pacific
Implementation Plan and the CoOP report on Wind-Driven Transport on the
U.S. West Coast present the rationale for a co-ordinated study in the
Northeast Pacific along the west coast of North America. The Northeast
Pacific Study is not restricted to the continental margin and shelf, but
encompasses the larger oceanic boundary region and the processes and
phenomena that effect the coastal ocean. The initial phases of this
cooperative, inter-agency research program will support integrated,
multi-investigator, inter-disciplinary programs of modeling,
retrospective analysis, and monitoring studies of a pilot nature;
process studies will be supported in the future. The pilot monitoring
and retrospective studies are primarily directed to goals of the U.S.
GLOBEC program, while the modeling and process studies address the goals
of the CoOP, U.S. GLOBEC, and the NOAA/COP program. This co-ordinated
effort has the overall goal of improving predictability and management
of U.S. marine resources through understanding of the Northeast Pacific
ecosystem.
A. Research Program Goals
Within the overall goal outlined above, this co-ordinated Northeast
Pacific Program has three general goals:
- To understand the effects of climate variability and climate change on the distribution, abundance and production of marine animals (including salmon and other commercially important living marine resources) in the eastern North Pacific.
- To determine the processes that control the cross-margin (inshore to offshore) transport of biological, chemical, and geological materials in a strongly wind-driven system.
- To embody this understanding in diagnostic and prognostic models, capable of elucidating ecosystem dynamics and responses on a range of time scales, including major climatic fluctuations.
The specific objectives and scientific questions related to these goals
are described in greater detail in CoOP Report No. 4 and U.S. GLOBEC
Report No. 17. These reports should be consulted in responding to this
Announcement.
B. Research Approach
The U.S. GLOBEC emphasis in the Northeast Pacific Program will be on: 1)
the effects of past and present climate variability on the population
ecology and population dynamics of salmon and zooplankton within the
ecosystem of the Northeast Pacific coastal ocean, and 2) the use of
this information as a proxy for how these ecosystems may respond to
future global climate change. The program will use the strong temporal
variability in the physical and biological signals to examine the
mechanisms through which zooplankton and salmon populations respond to
physical forcing, and biological interactions in the northeast margins
of the subarctic and subtropical gyres. Annual and interannual
variability will be studied directly through monitoring activities (over
a 5-7 year period) and detailed process studies (over a 5 year period);
variability at longer time scales will be examined through retrospective
analysis of directly measured and proxy data. Coupled bio-physical
models of the ecosystems of these regions will be developed and tested
using the process studies and data collected from the monitoring
programs. The models will also be tested by hindcasting retrospectively
analyzed time series.
CoOP interests involve modeling and intensive process studies in two
regions over a five year period. Although the along-shore coastal winds
are the dominant forcing from the northwest tip of Washington (48°N) to
Point Conception (35°N) in southern California, there is a significant
difference north and south of about 40°N. During summer, the along-shore
winds are strongly favorable for coastal upwelling but are more variable
north of about 40°N. During winter, low pressure systems from the Gulf
of Alaska cause a strong northward component in the coastal winds and
downwelling along the coast of Oregon and Washington, while upwelling
generally continues intermittently south of San Francisco (37°N),
interrupted by occasional winter storms. These differences in forcing
and response form a natural laboratory within which processes
responsible for wind-driven cross-shelf transport can be studied
intensively and incorporated into theoretical, numerical and laboratory
models of these systems. The wide range of conditions within the CCS
have led to a recommendation that parallel studies north and south of
about 40°N be made. Possible locations are central Oregon and northern
California. The logistical proximity, the historical oceanographic data,
and the relative environmental simplicity of these regions (lack of
major riverine, topographic, or tidal effects) makes them especially
attractive for a study of wind-driven processes affecting cross-margin
transport.
1. Modeling.
Planning activities for the co-ordinated Northeast Pacific Study (U.S.
GLOBEC Report No. 11; U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 15; and CoOP Report No. 4,)
have identified modeling efforts that are needed to help plan field
studies. These reports, as well as the U.S. GLOBEC Northeast Pacific
Implementation Plan (U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 17), should be consulted by
investigators intending to address items contained in this Announcement.
Those model types are:
- Basin-scale, general circulation modeling with higher-resolution,
nested coastal components (that could include coupled
biological-physical elements). A link to entire North Pacific
simulations that are coupled to large scale atmospheric models are
desirable, especially for hindcasting studies.
- High resolution models of physical processes that govern
cross-shelf transport in both upwelling and downwelling regimes with the
objective of providing assistance in the design of field studies and the
dynamical interpretation of field measurements. Such models might
include:
- Models of physical processes that govern behavior of the coastal
upwelling front.
- Formulations addressing cross-shelf exchange processes over the
inner shelf (depth approximately < 30 m), especially the role of
topographic irregularities for governing horizontal and vertical
transport.
- Coupled atmosphere-coastal ocean models that address small-scale
spatial variability of winds, atmospheric and oceanic boundary layer
depths.
- Simulations of the transport and distribution of biological and
chemical properties as a result of physical processes. These should be
linked with physical model development. Furthermore, they should provide
results useful for designing the field program. Such models might
include:
- Regional-scale, coupled biological-physical models. These
might seek to assimilate available observations resolving the exchange
of water and organisms between the coastal shelf and deeper oceanic
waters.
- Mesoscale, coupled biological-physical formulations. Models of
this type should aim to resolve fronts, include mixed-layer dynamics,
and operate over diurnal time scales. In general, they should
incorporate coastal transport processes and detailed biology, including
food web relations and organism behavior.
- Modeling efforts that investigate the response of biological
metapopulations (and spatially structured populations) to spatially and
temporally varying physical forcing.
- Models of the processes that regulate solute and particulate
exchange between the benthic boundary layer and the seafloor,
emphasizing those aspects that influence cross- shelf transport.
- Comparisons that relate field measurements to model predictions,
including the development of new techniques where necessary, with the
goal of incorporating the results of such comparisons into improved
models. This includes, but is not limited to coupled physical/biological
models in which biological, as well as physical, data is assimilated
into improved predictive schemes.
Several relevant and challenging lines of investigation cut across these
model types. These include:
- the functional details of how to parameterize individual interactions
between organisms (e.g., predator-prey);
- how to embed a regional model of coupled biological-physical
processes within a basin-scale circulation model, or a mesoscale
formulation within a regional model;
- the identification of which complex problems, especially coupled
physical-chemical, or physical-biological problems, might best be
attacked by idealized process models (or models in idealized domains);
- the specification of boundary conditions, particularly along open
boundary segments; and
- the assimilation of physical, biological, chemical and sediment
transport data into models of all kinds.
To meet the general goals of the U.S. GLOBEC Northeast Pacific program,
the models can focus on a broad suite of species and issues. However,
the construction of coupled physical-biological models that are most
relevant to the effects of climate change on North Pacific coastal
ecosystems are the ultimate objective of the program. Modeling studies
may be developed with a focus on species targeted for the process
studies (Table 3, U.S. GLOBEC Northeast Pacific Implementation Plan,
U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 17) or other non-targeted species, which could be
sampled in the monitoring or analyzed in retrospective studies (Table 4,
same document).
U.S. GLOBEC and CoOP planning has proceeded with the intent that early
model results will be used in planning the field programs in the coastal
Northeast Pacific. Accordingly, proposals MUST contain a section
specifically addressing the procedures and timing of the transfer of
results from models to potential investigators for the field programs.
This can be done through a variety of activities: open meetings;
publications; or homepages. The most critical element in such a transfer
of model results is timeliness; the communication of such results MUST
come early in the planning stages of the field observation activities
(see the timetables proposed in U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 17 and CoOP
Report No. 4. This may require presentations at planning meetings,
reports, etc., in advance of modeling results appearing in archival
publications.
Finally, proposers must include a section where they explain how their
proposal fits the requirements of this Announcement, and either U.S.
GLOBEC Report No. 17 or CoOP Report No. 4.
2. Retrospective Analysis.
To augment the new data that will be collected during early monitoring
and later process-study components of the U.S. GLOBEC Northeast Pacific
study, existing data should be more thoroughly examined. Proposed
retrospective analysis projects should address the documentation of
natural variability in the ecosystems of the Northeast Pacific, the
examination of linkages between processes occurring at different time
scales, and the design of possible monitoring and process study
observational programs. Examples of such projects might involve (but are
not limited to):
- Widely-used existing data sets, such as the CalCOFI and COADS data,
that have not been fully exploited for the understanding of ecosystem
processes.
- Records of fish scale and microscopic organism abundances from
layered anaerobic sediments. Some of these records extend into the past
for thousands of years, with time resolution of a few years.
- Records of growth recorded in fish scales and otoliths. For
salmon in particular, scales have been collected from fish for over 50
years. Those scale data could be used to examine how growth may have
varied through time, perhaps in response to large-scale shifts in
climate and ocean conditions.
- Use of archival collections to determine the genetic composition
of fish and invertebrate populations. Archived scales, otoliths and
zooplankton samples could provide sources of DNA to examine spatial and
temporal patterns of genetic differentiation in the northeast Pacific.
Potential proposers are directed to prior U.S. GLOBEC reports (see esp.
U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 11, and U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 15) that review
the types of data sets available for retrospective examination of the
links between climate, ocean physics and marine animal populations.
Those sets include: 1) repetitive observations from satellites; 2)
time-series of point and gridded instrumental observations; 3) ocean
surveys of in-situ biophysical data; 4) historical records of animal
population changes; and 5) time series reconstructed from
paleoecological data contained within marine sediments.
3. Pilot Monitoring.
The U. S. GLOBEC and CoOP reports suggest that a new, augmented set of
long-term measurements is needed in the Northeast Pacific. These
observations are required to interpret spatial variability along
latitudinal gradients and temporal variability at all scales, (i.e.,
resolve event, seasonal, and interannual time scales). Such monitoring
should be done near each of the major process study sites -- these are
likely to be the regions off central Oregon, northern or central
California, and the coastal Gulf of Alaska. Methods should be
standardized to permit comparison among regions and over time. These
measurements should permit the following three specific objectives to be
accomplished.
- The data collected should allow an assessment of the relationship between the period of each process study, the entire 5-7 year Northeast Pacific study, and the phases of the basin-wide ENSO signal.
- Local forcing and biological, chemical and physical responses should be defined well enough by the measurements to help separate local and distant forcing.
- The data collections should be designed to allow investigators to distinguish anthropogenic climate impacts from natural variability, if such a distinction is possible.
Accordingly, the monitoring designs might require coordination with the
retrospective analysis activity. Thus, sites chosen should have
historical records that are as complete as possible.
Long-term monitoring will provide a link between the intensive,
process-oriented studies from the CGOA and CCS sites, and the
larger-scale, longer period climate variations. Due to the large spatial
scale, and advective nature of west coast systems, regular occupation of
a few selected onshore-offshore transect lines will be the foundation
for monitoring ocean conditions and variability along the west coast.
Satellite sensing and moored instrumentation are excellent tools for
some observations, but many biological quantities require ship sampling.
Quarterly or bimonthly sampling with large oceanographic vessels to
100-200 km offshore will be supplemented by more frequent sampling
(perhaps monthly, or more frequently during critical times [e.g. spring
bloom; spawning events; juvenile salmon migration]) of the nearshore end
(out to perhaps 20-25 km) of these transects by smaller vessels.
Frequent cruises on established lines will be needed for: 1) calibrating
indirect measures from remote-instrumentation; 2) sampling ecosystem
components directly, (e.g., zooplankton abundance and species
composition, as well as salmonid juveniles and their competitors and
predators, that cannot be collected remotely); and 3) relating the
biological and physical observations from moorings to larger regions.
It is recommended that biological and physical observations be obtained
at the basin (gyre) scale and incorporated into the data sets collected
along the transect lines. Such large-scale observations may involve a
substantial commitment to remotely-sensed information. This will enable
the connection to be made between the large scale forcing and the
regional process studies in the CGOA and CCS. These observations of the
circulation and biology of the gyre are critical in connecting the CGOA
to basin-scale forcing, the CCS to basin-scale forcing, and comparing
the responses of the CGOA and CCS.
The initial monitoring effort should be a relatively modest pilot study.
Despite the modest level of anticipated activity, the plans for the
coastal Northeast Pacific Study envision at least two pilot monitoring
lines: one north of the west- wind drift (CGOA), and one south of the
west-wind drift (CCS). A detailed discussion of the proposed monitoring
program appears in U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 17. Potential proposers are
especially advised to consider Tables 5 and 6. These tables describe the
minimum set of core measurements that would constitute an acceptable
pilot monitoring program. Potential investigators are encouraged to
propose ancillary measurements, in addition to the minimal set, that can
be readily collected in an efficient and cost- effective fashion. The
value of such ancillary data will be an additional criterion upon which
pilot monitoring proposals will be evaluated. Efforts to cross-reference
monitored quantities to other measurement efforts, past or present, will
also be considered in evaluating pilot monitoring proposals.
Where feasible, monitoring data should be made available in real time,
so that opportunistic studies can be conducted within a known physical
and biological context. Further, consideration of the statistical power
of the monitoring program (including some measure of the statistical
properties of estimators derived from the monitored quantities) is
advised.
Of related interest--potential NASA support for remote sensing studies related to
the Northeast Pacific Study.
PROPOSAL FORMAT
Proposals submitted in response to this Announcement of Opportunity
should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the guidelines
provided in the NSF brochure, Grant Proposal Guide (GPG) NSF 95-27.
Single copies of this brochure are available at no cost from the Forms
and Publications Unit, phone (703) 306-1130, or via e-mail from
pubs@nsf.gov, or the NSF homepage (http://www.nsf.gov/) Proposals will
be subjected to initial screening for the requirements in the GPG and
will be returned without review or advance notification if deficiencies
are found. Proposals will NOT be forwarded to other Programs if found to
be inappropriate for this competition.
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
All proposals involving Federal and/or academic scientists must be
submitted to the address below. Federal scientists will be eligible for
funding by NOAA but not NSF. Proposals submitted in response to this
Announcement of Opportunity must be received by 14 February 1997 and be
identified by entering "CoOP-GLOBEC Northeast Pacific NSF 97-25" in the
Program Announcement block of the cover page. Proposals received after
the deadline will be returned to the sender without review.
Prospective investigators should provide in their proposals a full
scientific justification for the research and not simply reiterate
justifications laid out in the implementation plans. In addition, it
would be helpful if a brief statement is included as to how proposed
efforts may be co-ordinated with efforts of other potential
investigators. Because of page limitations (GPG, page 5, Project
Description), individual proposals with overly complex structure and
large numbers of investigators are discouraged. Proposals should be
written to allow adequate review of the details of such things as goals
and objectives, conceptual framework, methodological approaches,
integration with other likely projects, and synthesis.
An original and 20 copies of the proposals should be sent to:
Announcement Number (NSF 97-25)
Biological Oceanography Program
Division of Ocean Sciences
National Science Foundation
4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 725
Arlington, VA 22230
Proposals may also be submitted electronically. For information, contact
the Electronic Proposal Submission Program Director, Division of
Information Systems, phone (703) 306-0214, or via e-mail, eps@nsf.gov
(Internet).
If you have questions or require further information, contact H.
Lawrence Clark or Phil Taylor NSF Division of Ocean Sciences: 703-
306-1584 (e-mail: hclark@nsf.gov,prtaylor@nsf.gov), or Judy Gray,
NOAA Coastal Ocean Office, 301-713-3338, (e-mail: jgray@cop.noaa.gov.
PROPOSAL REVIEW
Review of proposals and support of the CoOP/U. S. GLOBEC Northeast
Pacific program will be handled cooperatively by NSF and NOAA. Proposals
will be evaluated based on the four general criteria described in the
NSF Grant Proposal Guide and in accordance with established NSF and NOAA
procedures for external merit review. The proposal's responsiveness to
the stated goals of the CoOP and U. S. GLOBEC programs at NSF/OCE and
the regional ecosystem studies and U. S. GLOBEC initiatives at the NOAA
Coastal Ocean Program, and the degree to which the proposed project
complements other proposed and ongoing research projects will also be
considered in the evaluation by panel(s) of expert scientists.
Proposals should include plans for the documentation, archiving, and
dissemination of CoOP/U. S. GLOBEC research data. All funded
participants must adhere to data management policies applying to
recipients of federal funding in geosciences. The CoOP and U.S. GLOBEC
Data Policies are available through the respective offices and
homepages. Following the review process, Federal scientists and others
who are selected to receive funding from NOAA, may be required to submit
additional forms and paperwork required by NOAA.
REFERENCES
CoOP report No. 4, 1994. Wind-driven Transport Processes on the U.S.
West Coast.
U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 7, 1992. Eastern Boundary Current Program:
Report on Climate Change and the California Current Ecosystem.
U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 11, 1994. Eastern Boundary Current Program: a
Science Plan for the California Current.
U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 15, 1996a. Report on Climate Change and Carrying
Capacity of the North Pacific Ecosystem.
U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 16, 1996b. Climate Change and Carrying Capacity
Science Plan.
U.S. GLOBEC Report No. 17, 1996c. Northeast Pacific Implementation
Plan.
The National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) provide awards for research in the
sciences and engineering. The awardee is wholly responsible for the
conduct of such research and preparation of the results for publication.
The NSF and NOAA, therefore, do not assume responsibility for such
findings or their interpretation. The NSF and NOAA welcome proposals on
behalf of all qualified scientists and engineers, and strongly encourage
women, minorities, and persons with disabilities to compete fully in any
of the research and research-related programs described in this
document.
In accordance with Federal statutes and regulations, and NSF and NOAA
policies, no person on grounds of race, color, age, sex, national
origin, or disability shall be excluded from participation in, denied
the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or
activity receiving financial assistance from the NSF and NOAA.
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities
provides funding for special assistance or equipment to enable persons
with disabilities (investigators and other staff, including student
research assistants) to work on an NSF project. Contact the program
coordinator in the Directorate for Education and Human Resources. The
telephone number is (703) 306-1636. The Foundation has TDD (Telephonic
Device for the Deaf) capability, which enables individuals with hearing
impairment to communicate with the NSF Information Center about NSF
programs, employment, or general information. To access NSF TDD, dial
(703) 306-0090; for FIRS, 1-800-877-8339.
PRIVACY ACT AND PUBLIC BURDEN
The information requested on proposal forms is solicited under the
authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. It
will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals and
may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of
the review process; to applicant institutions/grantees to provide or
obtain data regarding the application review process, award decisions,
or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts,
volunteers and researchers as necessary to complete assigned work; and
to other government agencies in order to coordinate programs. See
Systems of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and
Associated Records," 60 Federal Register 4449 (January 23, 1995), and
NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records," 59 Federal
Register 8031 (February 17, 1994). Submission of the information is
voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however,
may reduce the possibility of your receiving an award.
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or
any other aspect of this collection of information including suggestions
for reducing this burden, to:
Herman G. Fleming
Reports Clearance Officer
Contracts, Policy and Oversight
National Science Foundation
Arlington, VA 22230
This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance category 47.050
OMB 3145-0058
PT: 34
KW 1008004, 0103001
NSF97-XXX (Replaces 95-143)
Click here for information on a related COP program in the Pacific Northwest - PNCERS -- Pacific
Northwest Coastal Ecosystem Regional Study