The agenda for the meeting was:
There are four continuing projects from Phase VI A. Five new projects have been identified for funding in Phase IV B, with a sixth that may yet be funded. For a list of all projects and access to the project summaries click here.
2. Zooplankton population dynamics on Georges Bank: model and data
synthesis (Franks et al.)
Jeff Runge presented the project
update. Manuscripts have been submitted on modeling the
retention of dormant copepods in the Gulf of Maine (Johnson,
Pringle, Chen) and on the vital rates of Calanus
finmarchicus (Johnson and Gentlemen). The latter found
major differences between the GLOBEC years and the MARMAP
decade. During GLOBEC the Calanus abundance was 3 to 6
times higher and the timing of the seasonal abundance
increase was earlier than in the earlier period.
3. Patterns of energy flow and utilization on Georges Bank (Gifford
et al.)
This project combines a top down consumption model
for the upper trophic levels with a bottom up production
model of the lower levels for the Georges Bank food web.
Four time stanzas are considered, each characterized by
different physical conditions and fish population structure.
One striking result of the modeling is that the plankton
requirements of pelagic fish community in the first stanza
(1960's) was much lower than the abundance of plankton
indicated by the GLOBEC data. The conclusion is that the
plankton abundance was lower in the earlier years, perhaps
due to large-scale environmental conditions at the time.
Related data sets from the period offer support for this
conclusion.
4. Tidal front mixing and exchange on Georges Bank: controls on
the production of phytoplankton, zooplankton, and larval
fishes (Houghton et al.)
The report was given by Chen and
Lough. Considerable effort has been given to getting the
small-scale temperature variability right in the model.
Once the model gets that right, it can get the dye
dispersion right. Resolving bottom topography has been
found to be critical in getting the tidal nutrient pumping
right. A manuscript on the larval prey field is nearing
completion. Also, the larval dynamics model now appears
properly parameterized and results have been published from
an earlier project. This modeling component is now ready to
be combined with the physical component for the tidal front
region.
6. Impact of climate and basin-scale variability on seeding and
production of Calanus finmarchicus in the Gulf of
Maine/Georges Bank region (Gangopadhyay et al.)
This
project will look at the large basin-scale and long time
scale variability of the physical environment. It will
compare high vs low NAO periods (1980-1993, 1962-1971),
using an IBM approach to model the Calanus populations for
the NW Atlantic. It will then look on a finer scale at the
GLOBEC region during the 1988-1999 period using NAO
simulations from a NASA project.
7. Effects of climate variability on Calanus dormancy patterns and
population dynamics in the Northwest Atlantic (Runge and
Leising)
This project will investigate the factors
controlling diapause by Calanus. This is an extension of
a similar project previously funded in the GLOBEC
California Current program. The intent is to identify
environmental conditions controlling dormancy, with
temperature and food supply believed to be the primary
drivers. The core hypothesis is that regional differences
in populations could be due to differences in dormancy
patterns caused by different temperature and food
conditions. There are a number of data sets from
different regions to support the analysis.
8. Factors determining early-life-stage survival and recruitment
variability in N. Atlantic cod: a comparison between NW
Atlantic and Norwegian Sea systems (Werner et al.)
This
will be a comparative study between cod on Georges Bank and
in the Norwegian Sea, and will involve a close
collaboration with Norwegian researchers who have been
doing GLOBEC-like studies of cod. The effort will use a
basin-scale circulation model, with increased resolution in
two regions of interest, and include IBM tropho-dynamic
models for larvae and early juveniles. For Georges Bank
the focus will be on 1995, 1998, 1999, while for the
Norwegian Shelf 1985, 1986 and, perhaps, some other more
recent overlapping year, will be analyzed. Werner will be
at IMR (Bergen) for a few months in 2006 to work on the
basin-scale modeling.
9. Marine ecosystem responses to climate-associated remote forcing
from the Labrador Sea (Greene et al.)
This project will
investigate the importance of remote forcing from the
Labrador Sea on the Gulf of Maine/Georges Bank region. Of
particular interest is the advection of low salinity water
that was a major aspect of the physical variability on
Georges Bank during the GLOBEC years. In addition, the
impact of this variability in the Middle Atlantic Bight also
will be investigated. A working group of researchers who
have been working on these and other related topics will
define the approaches and data sets to be used in addressing
issues. They also will provide guidance to two graduate
students who will carry out the identified analyses. In
addition, another project with a comparable working group is
considering how climate variability can be incorporated into
fisheries models used in management. Interaction between
the two working groups is planned to promote passing of
information and results between the two projects.
10. Effect of marine reserves on cod and haddock population
dynamics: application of GLOBEC results to ecosystem
management (Hare et al.)
This project has not been
identified for funding, but may yet be in the near future.
It will address developing applications for use in
ecosystem-based management. The spatially explicit models
from GLOBEC will be combined with a spatially explicit
population model for the reproducing adult cod stock. The
effects of varying climate conditions and of the
presence/absence of closed areas (with no harvesting of the
adult cod) will be investigated.
Future meetings and collaboration among the projects: How the Georges Bank program as a whole will move forward was discussed. It was generally agreed that regular, though perhaps somewhat informal, meetings where the various projects present their progress and exchange ideas would be very helpful. To accomplish this, a capability to hold the meetings remotely via the web or some form of video conferencing could save money and allow more investigators to take part. This will be an issue for all of the regional GLOBEC programs and should be brought up at next week's GLOBEC SSC meeting.
The New EXCO: It was decided that each new project will identify two persons to form the new Executive Committee, since the continuing projects will soon end. Each project leader should send the names to Bob Groman by the end of this week. The first meeting will be scheduled after the new committee is constituted.